About your Search

20130101
20130131
STATION
CSPAN2 18
LANGUAGE
English 18
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18
on the theory that lexus moore -- less is moore which i tell my writing students at u. penn and speaking of them one of the reasons i am hurtling back to cold philadelphia's because i have to hold office hours tomorrow with the little i.v. brats. i best to get home and sleep well or try to sleep well although my wife and i say we haven't slept well since the jimmy carter administration. [laughter] thank you so much. you are holding us up. i think that's the key. and i bet i won't even have time to formally say thank you and good by two miles so i will just say two miles how eloquent his little segue introductions have been and tell him goodbye and are low and all the rest of you for coming. i am supposed to read something. i was fretting about what that would be because i wanted to make it very short. i am going to read from the end of the prologue. one of the things that i was trying to stress in the talk that i gave yesterday and indeed the panel that i had appeared on the day before is that for all of the undeniable, appalling, dark side of ernest hemingway there was also the light. t
cannot does what he needs to do. someone has the brilliant idea, actually fred moore and the white house sells the idea. you're correct. there was a fred moore. has this brilliant idea that rehnquist is the guide. he's smart and he's really going to be a guy that can be on the court for 30 years or more, which of course is what happened and they plant the seed with nixon. mitchell you can listen to the tape and you can hear mitchell and nixon is kind of rolling around in his mind and at first he doesn't really like the idea, but he warms to it because he's got a deadline. you must make a speech. 10 hours before the speech, he decides rehnquist is his name along with lewis powell. >> guest: is fascinating. he mentioned the tapes which any one of our viewers can get from the archives. but in your to make a copy and listen to it. your richard nixon, graduate of duke law school get jealous when he saw the smart rehnquist was at stanford. i remember the president said something to the effect commending u.s. and is hard at stanford as it was said duke because john mitchell the attorney general
industry has gotten on what they call a moore's law curve meaning price performance improves by roughly two times every 18-24 months. in the last four years, we've gotten ourselves in an innovation cycle in batteries so that by the end of 2020 electric vehicles actually will be price competitive with gas-driven cars. the problem with these things is that we can't wait. we can't wait because of the environmental effects, and we can't wait because we need the economy to grow quickly right now. so the book lays out a whole bunch of different ideas for bringing private investment much, much more quickly into the job of rebuilding the power plant. >> host: reed hundt, recently on this policeman james glans was on this program. he's written a series on some of the new york power plants, and he doesn't necessarily agree that the internet is completely green or is terribly green. what's your thought on that? >> guest: well, he's right about that. people say the data centers in the united states account for 2% of all electricity consumption. if it isn't exactly that number, it certainly is the bigge
terry adamson in the discussion of jack nelson's ms. moore "scoop the evolution of a southern reporter." it's about an hour >> good evening everyone. my name is hain't and i will be moderating this wonderful panel tonight. the director of the journalism program at emory and a co-author of a book about news coverage in the civil rights movement that featured jack quite prominently. first i want to thank the carter library and museum for hosting this and cosponsoring this and also emory university which houses the papers and the wisdom of a great journalists and we are so pleased that the to the surprise winners and the latest among them is jack nelson. barbara was generous and made jack's papers our possession now and there is some rich history and i encourage everyone to go and take a look at them. we are here to celebrate the life, memoir, peepers of jack nelson with some people that knew him extremely well. jack was a man of enormous influence and consequence in the nation. the story of jack nelson for those that don't know is the story of news reporting and of the latter half of the
. and if that wasn't enough, if cameron 1839, when moore broke in europe, harry found himself back at the mayo clinic and the doctors had ruled out a recurrence of cancer, but they couldn't figure out why he was unable to solar nature since. said they came up with a dog's breakfast of intravenous feeding, the transfusions, injections of liver extract, a combination which he had mr. t. had off and on for the rest of his life and sometimes it works and sometimes it didn't. but for the rest of his life, he was unable to gain weight. his digestive system alluded to the.is to figure out. his digestive system is a mess. sometimes the verge of starvation. so spring 1940, before he moved into the white house, he was at his house in georgetown on industry, a rented house with his daughter, diana. he was still recovering. and the president had some challenges on his mind. the president is hitler would soon turn to the last, invalid the rest of europe and britain to invade, if not the british islands. and the far east, japan was on the march in the national security of the united states was engraved -- was grav
overtreated and not the wizard is seminal for us in understanding more is not better , that moore can hurt us. it was her book to explain that to eyes and therefore i sought her out to be in our film. c-span: here she is in others. >> the vast majority are paid by a fee-for-service system. that means they get paid for each office visit. if their surgeons, they get paid for each procedure. if it's a radiologist, they get paid for each ct scan they deliver. c-span: if i spent five minutes for you, you probably get paid $1500. for me to spend 45 minutes on an established visit with the patient to make sure they're doing exercise, making sure diabetes is okay and to figure out whether to problem says, probably get paid $15. it's a completely irrational system. >> fee-for-service rewards physicians for doing more. it does not reward them for doing a better job. it doesn't report them for keeping patients healthy. it rewards them for giving more care. c-span: what the doctors think of the fee-for-service? did you find out? >> guest: it is an antiquated, broken, perverse system that nobody is happy
are, the moore our economy grows, artists, teachers, professors, entrepreneurs, you name it. the children are our greatest natural resource in america, but yet we leave it undercultivated. so this woman says that and i say, why don't we see what it's like to live on food stamps or the snap program, and so i went to bed thinking, no big deal, and i woke up and it was a big story, and so i called my staff and i said, guess what i'm doing? and so -- but it was a powerful thing because we're one of 14 cities in america to have a food policy director, and i think all cities into have it. we have already done a lot of work on trying too expand affordable healthy options, and the more i talked with my food policy director, said this is a great thing, not only raise levels of compassion and understanding and disspell pad stereotypes about snap, and families on snap, and focus them instead on the realities of that, but also the policy changes we could be making at a local level to empower -- to address food and security to address food and nutrition deserts and end expand more health
of solar power, for example. something similar to moore's law applying to solar panels. >> it's not actually fully moore's law, there's also sort of the china law which is china overproduces to the point of bankruptcy. [laughter] which is sort of why the panels are so low. but it's close. >> but do you see technology as transforming our energy situation? >> it is. and i think although it's controversial, the fact of the matter is we should give credit to the people who invented these new forms of oil and natural gas drilling generally known as fracking, hydraulic fracking and so forth. those are american technological successes that have enabled us to sort of find more of this stuff. and, again, we can decide -- we can have a separate discussion as to how to regulate them and so forth which is very controversial. but the fact of the matter is that has materially changed the economic structure of energy in america. if you take a look at conservation and renewables which i think is, ultimately, the right answer, what you see now is the automation and instrumentation of passive s
of reasonableness? >> i don't believe it does, justice kennedy. i think as virginia v. moore plainly teaches, individual state laws do not effect whether or not this activity was reasonable under the constitution. >> but we have always, and correct me if i'm wrong, i think that we have always thought of fourth amendment reasonableness standards as being a national standard. suppose 40 states, you know, we can play the game, suppose 40 states had rules, had warrants and many of them had expedited procedures. that's still irrelevant? we don't look at that at a all? >> your honor, i think this court's decision in sampson v. california is instruct i. in that particular case the court approves suspicionless searches, and i think a vast majority of states disapproved of that particular law enforcement practice. but that does not bear on the issue of whether or not that violates the fourth amendment. >> of course, we don't know why they disapproved, and i guess your point is they may well have not permitted it because they were under what you would call the mistaken belief that it was unconstitutio
, 90 come in one case 340 years. it was a stack of seconds. they gave joe moore, a hog farmer, who if i had enough, there were 60 mins, they did a great piece that shows the house joe moore, really a ramshackle hut, gave about a 90 year sentence but now, it was actually, the range was from probation to 99 years and for some reason the jury saw fit to give him nine years of grace. freddie, ma a 21 euros, son of a military man, he had gone to school, was in college, got a 25 year since. he asked his father way he should take a plea, and his father said look, if you're innocent you need to prove, get your day in court and go to trial and prove it. the son took his word, went to trial and got a 25 year sentence instead of a five year plea sends, since he would've gotten had he planned. the stories went on and on, and quickly, i probably most certainly would've done exactly if i had been in the same situation, people start to say we can get a fair trial, we are going to start to take place but to take place but i do have many of you know, but again tv makes it seem like everyone goes to tria
? my friend, steven moore, was on tv today. he's at the "wall street journal." he said, you don't have to worry about people coming in and being a public charge. there's a law against that. well, mr. moore, there may be a law against it but it's not being enforced. we need to know it's going to be enforced in the future. younger people in canada get a priority. well, pretty soon people will be on social security, medicare when they reach those ages. shouldn't we, as a rational nation, look to give priority to younger people who will work a little longer and pay more into the system before they draw these benefits? they give preferences to investors, those who create jobs and bring factories and -- and manufacturing to our country. those are the kind of things i think we ought to be talking about. this bill makes reference to guest workers in their outline. it's a very delicate issue. let me just tell you what was in last year's bill last time in 2007. and reason to my mind was one of the greater errors in the legislation. people would come into the country for three years. they could b
it with your help and i thank you for appearing here today. thank you. >> news moore? >> thank you so much. i joined so many others in ottavio who have turned your pain into some actionable plans for the current killings and violence. i just don't know that i can do it, so i really appreciate your appearing to help us sort through these things. i think part of what makes all this so helpless is because how do you prepare in this sleepy little town like newton, connecticut, anticipating that someone will come in and shoot 26 people. you just don't necessarily prepare for that as you might think of some big-city, where that might have been. but there are -- i'm talking about domestic violence now. we know that every single day there's going to be some woman who is going to be killed because there are restraining orders that are put out there and they won in his spouse a firearm is five times by likely to be killed or that we have federal laws prohibiting misdemeanor or felony -- folks of felonies from having a firearm, but what do you think? what do you think, cheese is maybe a grant program re
to go to jail moore with the farm bureau now but i know you usda. then i want to go to frank lloyd. i'm going to frank because they know we went to brazil together and we went and met with some ranchers down in brazil including assistance farmers and really were looking there at how brazil has tried to manage that intersection between agriculture production on the one hand and protecting its tropical forest. so let me start with you. bag and food and how they think about that and people are hungry. how do you transcend that and get the food without raping and pillaging the land? >> lynn thank you and congratulations to you on the council. it's really a fantastic and the program this morning was really thought provoking so thank you for bringing this together and thanks for the question. i'm with the nature conservancy. i think you on the chin what we do. we are a global organization in agriculture is really risen to the top of argento for the last couple of years so it's one of what we call our global priorities that we are working on and that is across the night dates as well as othe
] >> let me ask you a little bit about patrick moore. when you think that we can conceivably do tax reform without an agreement this tax code needs to raise? >> without an agreement, would it even make sense to try to do tax reform? >> by and large, no. there is a question about being revenue neutral and what neutrality would be and whether you could move around at things in that context. that is much harder to do. and once you start doing fundamental tax reform, what do you think? >> i think that sounds pretty good. so we can talk about this going forward. >> certainly okay, thank you. okay, let me try to be optimistic here. it's interesting that during the debate, and for a wild during the fiscal cliff debate, there was a discussion about support from across the aisle. bob, you think that is there anything that will be sparked from that discussion? >> my answer is no. the deductions are solutions that affect the middle class. they tend to be very popular. you know, everyone's for it in the abstract. the people want to bail out. you know, they are so far where they were before, they have
. they have the power to block legislation without even coming to the moore to explain themselves -- without even coming to the floor to explain themselves. in such a world, as we have seen, why would the minority come to the table to cut a deal? i showed you a list of all the legislation that they blocked the last couple of years. there wasn't any overcure from the -- overture from the minority to compromise. they just said, we're going 0 kill it. the dream act, for example. all the other bills here, the dream act and the other ones that i showed that we wanted to bring up. here, here's the list again. the dream act. well, did the republicans say, we will stomp up and down, we want to compromise? no, they just killed it. the bringing jobs home act, just kill it. the paycheck fairness act, just kill it. creating american jobs and ending offshoring act -- just kill it. notifies real attempt to compromise. they didn't have -- there was no real attempt to compromise. they didn't have to compromise. now, in contrast, under my proposal where you would have 60 votes at the beginning and if you did
tyler moore mary president john tyler while he was in office after his first wife passed away. c-span original new series, first ladies, influence and damage, public and private lives , interest, and their influence on the president, produced the white house historical association. season one begins present state of your 18th at 9:00 p.m. eastern and pacific on c-span, c-span radio, and c-span.org. >> next, today's white house briefing with press secretary jay carney. he talked about check hegel's nomination to become america's next and secretary commemoration policy, and the iranian nuclear program. this is 40 minutes. >> it could be. i did not really want to let you guys today. good afternoon, ladies and summoned. welcome back to the briefing room for your daily briefing. i do not have any announcements to make at the top, so i'll go straight to darlene. >> thank you. the jobs council expired today commanded is not being renewed. can you explain why it is not be renewed? >> as you know, when the president took office created the presidential economic advisory board affectional
's >> i believe it does. as virginia frizzes -- versus moore under the constitution. >> but we have always, correct me if i'm wrong, we have always voted to reasonable standards as being in national standard. >> suppose 40 states have rules and many of them have expedited procedure. is that relevant? we don't look at that at all. >> the decision and is instructive and in that particular case the court approved and a vast majority of states disapproved that particular law enforcement practice, but that doesn't bear on the issue of whether or not that violates the fourth amendment. >> of course we don't know why they disapproved. you're point is they may well not have permitted because they were under what he would call the mistaken belief that it was under the constitution. >> i suppose that is a possibility, justice scalia to respect any issuing in the conviction rate lower than the states would the practice is to take? >> your honor, i think the national district attorneys association cited a study i know the respondent also cited a study that shows it doesn't have any bearing, but i thin
or are thinking about addressing those pressures as demand for food expands. then i want to go to dale moore, with the farm pure -- bureau now, and then frank because i know he -- went to brazil together, and we met with ranchers down in brazil including assistance farmers, and, really, looking there at how brazil is trying to manage that intersection of agriculture production on the one hand and protecting its prop call forests. glen, let me start with you. >> [inaudible] >> yeah, ag and food and, you know, how they think about that, and how people are hungry. how do you transcend that and get them food, but not rape and pillage the land? >> lynn, thank you, and congratulations to you on the council on really a spectacular event and initiative overall, and the papers are good and the program is good. thank you for bringing us together and throwing the question our way. nature conservancy, you know generally what we do. we are a global organization, and agriculture is at the top of the agenda over the last couple years. it's what we call the global priorities we are working on, and that's he
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18